The Union Of The Crowns


By our own Mark Monaghan.

The Stewarts/Stuarts, Scotland's monarchy from foreign lands. For some, they provided her with the most disliked rulers they ever had, for others, a monarchy to be proud of. The growing alienation of the Scots from their royal house and its administrators, which had bred national revolt and revolution, eventually led to royal union between England and Scotland.


The Crown

In my research to help you understand the Jacobite Rebellion, but namely for this page the Union of the Crowns, I decided to write about why the Stuarts were exiled in the first place.
Not an easy task I would like to say.
However, a lot of reading, study and realization later I have decided to give you a quick tour of the history of the monarchy. If you'll allow me to skip a lot of the family relationships (if not I'd have to go back beyond Henry VIII) and start from somewhere sensible. I'll choose to start with two rival cousins - two Queens who stand in history as two of the greats.

Mary Stewart (Mary Queen of Scots) - Scotlands queen, and Elizabeth I - Englands queen.

The Crown

In brief:

Mary was the better looking of the two ladies, and a personal rivalry developed, Elizabeth, being badly scared from Small Pox used to whiten her face with a strange mixture of eggs, flower and other bizarre ingredients in order to give her a more pale complexion - just like her cousins (which was natural). 'This was common practice in those days as well was the fashion of strange wigs and hair styles in order to cover other, at that time incurable, disorders. Mary was married to the King of France who also declared himself the King of Scotland. Elizabeth was at war with France and religious divide between the Catholics and Protestants within Scotland, and political influence by both religious orders lead to division.

Scotland was divided, and support for the Auld Alliance between France and Scotland was failing. Elizabeth's help was required and she assisted by sending troops and cash to help the protestants out. Mary's husband died of an ear infection and France didn't regard her as anything worth bothering about any more. She had her own crown and they were too busy fighting the English anyway. She married again, fell pregnant by a secret lover and did herself no favours in the Scottish scene. Her lover was discovered and swiftly murdered. Her then husband was also murdered and so she married again. Religion, politics and distrust between France, Scotland and England reigned. James (later James VI) her son, spent a lot of time with Elizabeth and very little with her mother, who was back in Scotland after fleeing from France and England as neither France or Elizabeth wanted her around. Uproar in Edinburgh saw mobs of angry people label her as a whore, and wanted her out!

So. Scotland was now half ruling itself as a Nation without a monarch, or at least one they didn't really seem to want. France decided that her son James was the rightful heir to the English crown and since Elizabeth didn't have an heir they didn't have much room for complaint! Mary fled yet again and kind of thought that she could get some help from her cousin Elizabeth. Elizabeth swiftly imprisoned her as a threat to her crown and seemed to take a stronger liking to James, who, by this time was fairly adept with politics and gained favour with Elizabeth through his knack for holding an argument. France was pretty quiet by now, and when Elizabeth was asked if James would succeed her all she did was give a rather ambiguous 'finger' response. Finally Elizabeth decided that she had finished taunting Mary and chopped her head off.

The French supported James as the Scottish king, and so did the Scots. Elizabeth died a virgin and so without an heir. English parliament decided that it was time to end the fighting and agreed that James was eligible for their throne. The decision was made, supported by all concerned and James VI of Scotland became James I of England as well, and also Ireland! Lucky break for him.

Peace at last, but the French were only happy if the House of Stewart was given it's old French name - and so it was. James VI of Scotland, James I of England - The House of Stuart reigned on without much bickering.

The Crown
That's basically it in a very quick nut shell, and I'm sure that there are a lot of historians and Scots who would really like to have ago at me for giving such an important issue in history such a skim over the surface. I would like to say in my defence that I am not attempting to write a book but just inform readers of this page as to a bit of background as to how the Stuart's came to rule everything.

You have to remember that at this time in history, the population of all countries concerned was far less than it is now, and also that the royal families, as such, are still discussed in the highest circles of historians even today who argue there backgrounds. Who married who, who was related to who, who gave birth to who, who murdered who. We are only talking about a small number of people and families, and to swiftly bring you back to the matter at hand we are talking about the Jacobites - the James' from the House of Stuart, and why they were exiled.

Let me continue in a bit more depth from where I left off - JAMES VI OF SCOTLAND.

The Crown
James VI of Scotland, (also James I of England), had never really left Scottish soil until his eventual journey to England in the spring of 1603. He had been to Denmark previously, but only for a very short spell. This, his second trip abroad (as he would have seen it), was thoroughly enlightening and thrilling. The more pleasant climate, the sophistication and the wealth impressed and bemused him. He fell in love with the country and set about creating a plan and to devise a scheme which he believed would convince his subjects about the benefits which he was now enjoying.

He proposed a complete union of Scotland and England to form a single kingdom: Great Britain.

The Crown
A Scotsman who loved England? If he loved it so much why then could his Scots subjects not follow suit? The English had easily welcomed James as their King so why should they, in turn, not welcome his Scottish compatriots? These must have been the thoughts of James VI. It seemed fairly obvious to him that one king should mean one kingdom.All he had to do was erase the memories of centuries of distrust - warfare - border raids - invasion and racial hatred! In his mind England and Scotland shared a king, even though he was James I of England but James VI of Scotland, surely the task which he set himself of 'union' would not be that hard.

The Crown
He couldn't have been more wrong. The English saw this as a ridiculous idea and the English parliament instantly dismissed the proposal. They stated that his subjects who had followed him south were 'northern adjectives' and 'Caledonian bores'. One Englishman is quoted as saying: "They beg our lands, our goods, our lives". "They switch our nobles, and lye with their wives." said another.

Years later another Englishman was to write: "The aire might be wholesome but for the stinking people that inhabit it". James' dream of union was never going to become real if these were the attitudes which were being shown by his English subjects - even in the higher educated circles where he felt support was sure to come from, the attitude of Scottish hatred echoed.

The Scots, who, fearful that their nation would be swallowed up by their more numerous and powerful neighbours, were holding tight their hard earned national identity which much blood was spilt for over the centuries. It was too hard to forget and they were not about to sign over their overseas trade markets to English profiteers. Least to say they were hardly enthusiastic either.

It was easy to see that James' dreams and plans were never going to come to fruition in his lifetime so long as these attitudes were still being displayed.

The Crown
Scottish parliament, being more easily controllable than its English counterpart, did give James an Act of Union, but it was never supported by his southern subjects and a reciprocal Act was never forwarded and so the document became, in essence, a dead letter.

However, some of it's contents were salvaged from the Scottish proposal. The repeal for some mutually hostile laws, an agreement by the English to return fugitives from Scottish Justice, dual nationality for those born under the union of the crowns, and a reluctantly-flown union flag. Even this was then later withdrawn in 1634.

For the remaining years of the 1600's England and Scotland remained separate and independent kingdoms. Each with it's own parliament, taxes, church and laws. Some of which still last today - Scotland does have it's own laws and its own church, but it does not have it's own parliament - the latter is in discussion today, and with an election looming it is a political hot potato.Unfortunately for James VI, he had made a grave mistake. He was now spending all his time in England and treating Scotland as a northern province to his kingdom. Scotland's problem was that her King was spending too much time in voluntary exile south of the border, something which he had never previously done.

By this action, James was making a disastrous mistake. His reputation in Scotland was seriously undermined. However, as King of England he found himself far closer to the European stage than ever before. He stepped into the arena declaring himself 'Rex Pacificus', the King of Peace, claiming that he would reconcile the warring Protestant and Catholic nations. This too was a disaster, Spain was at war, as were the Germans and the Austrians. James did not have the power and influence that his Great Britain should have had and he overestimated his support dangerously.

The Crown
James did well all things considered. He got the hang of the English parliament and his work within religious sections in his own kingdom were more successful. He attempted to place a number of reforms on the Scottish church, most of which were rejected, but at least five famous Articles did get passed a half bribed Assembly in Perth. He had forced acceptance of these issues on the unwilling Scots but supervised their implementation from a great distance from England. Things were initiated with great success in theory, but in practice things went on as they had done before.

James VI failed to unite the nations as one united kingdom, but he did manage to rule as James VI of Scotland and James I of England with great success. There remained great distrust between his two kingdoms but he kept both sides reasonably happy and he did achieve a lot in his time and probably gave Scotland one of it's most competent political monarch's yet.


Go Back ButtonHome Page ButtonGo Highlander WebNext Page Button

* Back to previous page * Home page contents * Highlander Web's Index * Forward to next page *


Webspinner LogoCulloden - April 16th 1746
Copyright 1995/96 Catalyst (Highlands) Ltd.
Pages by Webspinner
admin@highlanderweb.co.uk